Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Türkiye’de Esnaflar Arasında Bireycilik-Kollektivizm ve Sapma: Niğde Örneği

Year 2022, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 11 - 17, 31.12.2022

Özden Özbay Sabuha Bindik

Abstract

Kültürel yönelim (bireycilik-kollektivizm) ve sosyal sapma arasındaki ilişki dünyada ve özellikle Türkiye’deki suç biliminde (kriminolojide) yetersiz şekilde çalışılmış konulardan bir tanesidir. Bu ilişki Türkiye’de Niğde ilindeki teasadüfi olmayan, kolay ulaşılabilir örnekleme yolu kullanılarak ilgili ilişki keşfedilmeye çalışıldı (N= 498). Bulgular, kollektif biçimlerde davrandıklarını belirtenlerin, bireyci şekillerde davrandıklarını belirtenler ile kıyaslandığında, daha az sapma eylemlerinde bulunduklarını göstermektedir. Fakat, bireycilik ve kollektivizm ile ilişkili çoğu değişkenler sapma davranışı ile ilişkili olarak anlamlı değillerdir. Ayrıca, risk ve önleyici faktörler (ekonomik stres/gerilim ve iş tatmini) bireyci ve kollektivist kültürel eğilimler tarafından “koşullandırılmamaktadır” (yani, “etkileşim etkisi” yoktur).

Keywords

Bireycilik Kollektivizm Sapma Esnaflar Niğde

References

  • Agnew, R. (2006). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. Roxbury.
  • Agnew, R. (2014, 20 June). Presidential address to the American Society of Criminology social concern and crime: Moving beyond the assumption of simple self-interest. Criminology 52(1), 1-32.
  • Agnew, R. (2015). Using general strain theory to explain crime in Asian societies. Asian Criminology 10, 131–147.
  • Bergmüller, S. (2013). The relationship between cultural individualism–collectivism and student aggression across 62 countries. Aggressive Behavior 39, 182–200.
  • Caffaro, F., Federico F. & Susanna S. (2014). Gender differences in the perception of honour killing in individualist versus collectivistic cultures: Comparison between Italy and Turkey. Sex Roles 71, 296–318.
  • Diener, E., Diener, M. & Diener, C. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69, 851–864.
  • Du, H., Xiaoming, L., Danhua, L. & Cheuk C. T. (2014). Hopelessness, individualism, collectivism, and substance use among young rural-to-urban migrants in China. Health Psychology & Behavioural Medicine 2(1), 211–220.
  • Fukushima, M., Susan F. S. & Emiko, K. (2009). Bond to society, collectivism, and conformity: a comparative study of Japanese and American college students. Deviant Behavior 30, 434–466.
  • Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press.
  • Hofstede Center, (2014). What about Turkey? Retrieved from https://www.hofstedeinsights.com/country/turkey/#:~:text=Turkey%20scores%20high%20on%20this,be%20told%20what%20to%20do.
  • Kagitcibasi, Ç. (2013). Adolescent autonomy-relatedness and the family in cultural context: What is optimal? Journal of Research on Adolescence 23(2), 223-235.
  • Kotlaja, M. M. (2018). Cultural contexts of individualism vs. collectivism: Exploring the relationships between family bonding, supervision and deviance. European Journal of Criminology 1–18.
  • Le, T. N. & Gary D. S. (2005). Individualism, collectivism, and delinquency in Asian American adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 34(4), 681–691.
  • Liu, J. (2016). Asian paradigm theory and access to justice. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice. 32(3), 205–224.
  • Liu, J. (2017). “The New Asian paradigm: A relational approach” in Comparative Criminology in Asia (pp. 17-32) edited by Jianhong Liu, Max Travers, & Lennon Y. C. Chang. Springer International Publishing.
  • Minkow, M. & Geert, H. (2013). Cross-cultural analysis: The science and art of comparing the world’s modern societies and their cultures. Sage.
  • Oyserman, D. & Spike W. S. L. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin 134(2), 311–342.
  • Oyserman, D., Heather M. C. & Markus K. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin 128(1), 3–72.
  • Pokhrel, P.; Brooke, L. B.; Sakshi, R.; Bulat, I.; Artur, G.; Leila, A. & Steve S. (2017). Individualism-collectivism, social self-control and adolescent substance use and risky sexual behavior. Substance Use & Misuse 53(7), 1-11.
  • Triandis, C. H. (1995). Individualism and collectivism (New directions in social psychology). Westview Press.
  • Triandis, C. H. (2018). Individualism and collectivism (New directions in social psychology). Routledge.

Year 2022, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 11 - 17, 31.12.2022

Özden Özbay Sabuha Bindik

Abstract

Keywords

Bireycilik Kollektivizm Sapma Esnaflar Niğde

References

  • Agnew, R. (2006). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. Roxbury.
  • Agnew, R. (2014, 20 June). Presidential address to the American Society of Criminology social concern and crime: Moving beyond the assumption of simple self-interest. Criminology 52(1), 1-32.
  • Agnew, R. (2015). Using general strain theory to explain crime in Asian societies. Asian Criminology 10, 131–147.
  • Bergmüller, S. (2013). The relationship between cultural individualism–collectivism and student aggression across 62 countries. Aggressive Behavior 39, 182–200.
  • Caffaro, F., Federico F. & Susanna S. (2014). Gender differences in the perception of honour killing in individualist versus collectivistic cultures: Comparison between Italy and Turkey. Sex Roles 71, 296–318.
  • Diener, E., Diener, M. & Diener, C. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69, 851–864.
  • Du, H., Xiaoming, L., Danhua, L. & Cheuk C. T. (2014). Hopelessness, individualism, collectivism, and substance use among young rural-to-urban migrants in China. Health Psychology & Behavioural Medicine 2(1), 211–220.
  • Fukushima, M., Susan F. S. & Emiko, K. (2009). Bond to society, collectivism, and conformity: a comparative study of Japanese and American college students. Deviant Behavior 30, 434–466.
  • Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press.
  • Hofstede Center, (2014). What about Turkey? Retrieved from https://www.hofstedeinsights.com/country/turkey/#:~:text=Turkey%20scores%20high%20on%20this,be%20told%20what%20to%20do.
  • Kagitcibasi, Ç. (2013). Adolescent autonomy-relatedness and the family in cultural context: What is optimal? Journal of Research on Adolescence 23(2), 223-235.
  • Kotlaja, M. M. (2018). Cultural contexts of individualism vs. collectivism: Exploring the relationships between family bonding, supervision and deviance. European Journal of Criminology 1–18.
  • Le, T. N. & Gary D. S. (2005). Individualism, collectivism, and delinquency in Asian American adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 34(4), 681–691.
  • Liu, J. (2016). Asian paradigm theory and access to justice. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice. 32(3), 205–224.
  • Liu, J. (2017). “The New Asian paradigm: A relational approach” in Comparative Criminology in Asia (pp. 17-32) edited by Jianhong Liu, Max Travers, & Lennon Y. C. Chang. Springer International Publishing.
  • Minkow, M. & Geert, H. (2013). Cross-cultural analysis: The science and art of comparing the world’s modern societies and their cultures. Sage.
  • Oyserman, D. & Spike W. S. L. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin 134(2), 311–342.
  • Oyserman, D., Heather M. C. & Markus K. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin 128(1), 3–72.
  • Pokhrel, P.; Brooke, L. B.; Sakshi, R.; Bulat, I.; Artur, G.; Leila, A. & Steve S. (2017). Individualism-collectivism, social self-control and adolescent substance use and risky sexual behavior. Substance Use & Misuse 53(7), 1-11.
  • Triandis, C. H. (1995). Individualism and collectivism (New directions in social psychology). Westview Press.
  • Triandis, C. H. (2018). Individualism and collectivism (New directions in social psychology). Routledge.
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Regional Studies
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Özden Özbay 0000-0002-1048-6257

Sabuha Bindik 0000-0003-1534-6752

Publication Date December 31, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022Volume: 1 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Özbay, Ö., & Bindik, S. (2022). Türkiye’de Esnaflar Arasında Bireycilik-Kollektivizm ve Sapma: Niğde Örneği. Uluslararası Güncel Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(1), 11-17.
 Download Cover Image

ISSN: 2980-1540
download

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 

download


International Journal of Current Social Science (CUSOS) is indexed by the following national and international scientific indexing services: